As a first news story on our soon to be ground-breaking news site, we give to you a point/counterpoint of sorts. Sure to be one of the most hotly debated issues of the Fall next to the War in Iraq, the new Bond film, Casino Royale, will hit U.S. theaters on November 17th. Here, our two leading correspondants, and credentialed film critics, Pat and Kyle discuss the latest action-packed trailer, and the implications of choosing a new Bond. So sit back and enjoy the bickering between the two.
Point of Reference: New Trailer
And now the debate...
p: the casino royale trailer looks fucking awesome
k: yea i know
it looks so clear too
man it was perfect
thats what i was most amazed by
and that chick is hot
yeah that was cool too but i am wondering if they are going to kill that girl off and use that to drive bond's vengence
probably
that would be so much darker than all the other bond movies
thats what they did in OHMSS
(On Her Majesty's Secret Service)
yeah but didn't that movie suck?
yeah i got what it was
it actually wasnt that bad
after i actually sat down and watched it
oh right... you liked it
his outfit was fucking stupid
yeah well something tells me that the movie was still i dunno fantastical
no more so than any other bond film
right exactly
just slightly on the fantastical side
thats what i mean
slightly... whatever.... they are way over the top
this one’s gonna be no different
did you see the plane part
and the part where they are jumping the scaffolding
and cranes
maaaaybbe? i don't remember
dude you know that street jumping stuff
yeah yeah but it seemed to have a much different feel than all the other ones
there was that nike commercial where they chased the chicken
do you know what i'm talking about
yeah
yea that guy that started that whole movement thing is one of the bad guys
so they do a huge scene with that
cool... that'll be pretty awesome
yea, so theres a clip in the trailer where bond jumps from one crane to another
i think it seems to me at least that this will be more bad ass whereas other bond movies have been more suave and debaunair or however you spell it
and i like it
the change that is
i still hope there is the suave and debonare side to it though
otherwise its just a mindless action movie
because the new bond is so un bond looking
sure but it can tone down the suave stuff and become something else
that in my opinion would be better
because i didn't really like all the sauve stuff
but then its not bond
that is part of what the bond character is
if you dont like that, then go watch a schwarzeneggar movie
every good franchise needs a change
the sauve stuff was getting old
not if it becomes something different
no one does that anymore
you cant say that xmen will no longer be about mutants
because then its not xmen anymore
no no no... not like a radical change
its not like you'd be calling bond .. fred or something
but taking away part of a distinct personality trait is radical
its like showing the backstory to wolverine
no its not
he was supposed to have no history
and then all of a sudden it was there
because wolverine is wolverine
bond is bond... whats you're point
bond isnt bond if you take away part of who he is
the lack of history was part of who wolverine was
if he's not a good looking suave ass kicker then its not bond
ok i'll put it this way
that was an explanation of who he was, but he still is who he is
this is like a restart
this new bond
(now colored by his past)
the goal, I am assuming is to start something new
if bond is restarted as something different and it continues as something different
then its not bond
bond is not only this one archetype
he changed from connery to whats his face
who was the second one
yea, but he has always been virtually the same
roger?
something
lazenby
no
then roger moore
yeah yeah
they were really different
it went connery lazenby connery moore
but they still had the same attributes
they werent complete redesigns
sure they were different people so obviously something changed
but they still embodied everything that bond is
oh... well i meant then roger moore... but they were still different enough to where people watching these movies when they came out, disliked the change and say that connery was bond and so bond is connery
right
and that anyone else trying to play bond can't
but they didnt say that
because bond is connnery
they just thought connery was a better bond
sure they did
roger moore has his followers
just the same as pierce
i am sure he did but that doesn't get past the point that there are crowds of people who say bond is connery or people today might say bond is brosnan and can't see it as anything else
yea
whats the point
i think we got way past what we were originally talking about
so having this new start with less suave and more badassism is still bond
people might not accept it right now in the same way they didn't for moving past connery
but my point is to still have it, and to completely change it is no longer bond
its not completely changing it though
he is still 007
and he is still killing people in cool ways...
that to change it would be better?
i think it would be... like this next movie for example
i think i will like this next movie than the other bond movies
yea, but what i am saying is if they arent going to make an effort to still be bondian then just change his name and make an action movie
but aren't they still making an effort?
i hope so
007?
secret agent?
yea, thats not all though
you can slap that on anything
i'm not dissing this movie by any means
i am just saying i hope they do an awesome job
what i am saying is that the characteristics you ascribe to bond change with the actors playing it as much as it is changing here... here it is changing in that now he is pissed
i want all the characteristics to be there
i agree the traits change in the emphasis
connery badass womanizer
moore suave
dalton action hero
and i agree with you that if he was a bumbling idiot and didn't get any women i will be disappointed
brosnan pretty boy
i just want it all to be there
because if they arent then it wont be bond
all of it?
in some way
you carazay?
thats too much for one bond to handle
you can dress up in a white sheet and not be a ghost pat
pretty boy, womanizer, suave and action hero
well everyone of them possessed it
they just emphasized one trait
to an extent
right
right, agreed
all i am saying is
i want this guy to do the same
thats where the make or break comes into play
kinda like i can play sports but it is not a very good or well developed trait
yea
you still possess it
brosnan... he was too nice to be a complete womanizer like connery... but he still slept around
another "pat" would play down the homosexuality and play up the sports side
face
yea
you got it
just as another kyle might actually be considerate and not just an asshole... yeah you got it
right
just making points
right, exactly
so basically we want craig to be everything
you do
but its alright if he plays up the action hero
ok fine
oh right yeah
but if he doesnt possess it all, then he's not bond
emphasize the strengths
yes
ok
or we should post this convo on our blog
debates on bond
debates on debond
ok
debunking bond
yea there we go
he doesn't exist!
yeah he does
it really wouldn't be debunking at all
whatever
analysis of a secret agent
dissassembling bond
:
ah there we go
Analysis of a Secret Agent: Disassembling Bond
try the other way around
disassembling bond is a better title
Disassembling Bond: Analysis of a Secret Agent
analysis is more of a description
yeah good point
mine is the better title
face
but mine lets you know its serious
yeah yeah
not some fluesy writing to her mother
i wish i knew how to spell fluesey
just jealous talk i hear there
but i hear yours a compensating
as compensatin
as compensating
ggggggggggggggggg
there ya happy
i don't know why but this made me just think of these dream i had where i broke into this underground club after shattering all these windows by jumping through them and i slept with 4 prostitutes
it was weird
hmm
then i didn't pay and i ran out
on that note i am going to get out of here and take a shower
alright i'll post this
So, decide for yourself. Which side do you choose?
1 comment:
yeah... i'm a loser.
this was written a few months ago, it's crazy long, and it's a debate on the bondiness of the new bond...
and yet, i read every line.
Post a Comment