As a first news story on our soon to be ground-breaking news site, we give to you a point/counterpoint of sorts. Sure to be one of the most hotly debated issues of the Fall next to the War in Iraq, the new Bond film, Casino Royale, will hit U.S. theaters on November 17th. Here, our two leading correspondants, and credentialed film critics, Pat and Kyle discuss the latest action-packed trailer, and the implications of choosing a new Bond. So sit back and enjoy the bickering between the two.
Point of Reference:  New Trailer
And now the debate...
p: the casino royale trailer looks fucking awesome
k: yea i know
 it looks so clear too
 man it was perfect
 thats what i was most amazed by
 and that chick is hot
 yeah that was cool too but i am wondering if they are going to kill that girl off and use that to drive bond's vengence
 probably 
 that would be so much darker than all the other bond movies
 thats what they did in OHMSS
 (On Her Majesty's Secret Service)
 yeah but didn't that movie suck?
 yeah i got what it was
 it actually wasnt that bad
 after i actually sat down and watched it
 oh right... you liked it
 his outfit was fucking stupid
 yeah well something tells me that the movie was still i dunno fantastical
 no more so than any other bond film
 right exactly
 just slightly on the fantastical side
 thats what i mean
 slightly... whatever.... they are way over the top
 this one’s gonna be no different
 did you see the plane part
 and the part where they are jumping the scaffolding
 and cranes
 maaaaybbe? i don't remember
 dude you know that street jumping stuff
 yeah yeah but it seemed to have a much different feel than all the other ones
 there was that nike commercial where they chased the chicken
 do you know what i'm talking about
 yeah
 yea that guy that started that whole movement thing is one of the bad guys
 so they do a huge scene with that
 cool... that'll be pretty awesome
 yea, so theres a clip in the trailer where bond jumps from one crane to another
 
 
 i think it seems to me at least that this will be more bad ass whereas other bond movies have been more suave and debaunair or however you spell it
 and i like it
 the change that is
 i still hope there is the suave and debonare side to it though
otherwise its just a mindless action movie
 because the new bond is so un bond looking
 sure but it can tone down the suave stuff and become something else
 that in my opinion would be better
 because i didn't really like all the sauve stuff
 but then its not bond
 that is part of what the bond character is
 if you dont like that, then go watch a schwarzeneggar movie
 every good franchise needs a change
 the sauve stuff was getting old
 not if it becomes something different
 no one does that anymore
 you cant say that xmen will no longer be about mutants
 because then its not xmen anymore
 no no no... not like a radical change
 its not like you'd be calling bond .. fred or something
 but taking away part of a distinct personality trait is radical
 its like showing the backstory to wolverine
 no its not
 he was supposed to have no history
 and then all of a sudden it was there
 because wolverine is wolverine
 bond is bond... whats you're point
 bond isnt bond if you take away part of who he is
 the lack of history was part of who wolverine was
 if he's not a good looking suave ass kicker then its not bond
 
 
 
 
 
 ok i'll put it this way
 that was an explanation of who he was, but he still is who he is
 this is like a restart
 this new bond
 (now colored by his past)
 the goal, I am assuming is to start something new
 if bond is restarted as something different and it continues as something different
 then its not bond
 bond is not only this one archetype
 he changed from connery to whats his face
 who was the second one
 yea, but he has always been virtually the same
 roger?
 something
 lazenby
 no
 then roger moore
 yeah yeah
 they were really different
 it went connery lazenby connery moore
 but they still had the same attributes
 they werent complete redesigns
 sure they were different people so obviously something changed
 but they still embodied everything that bond is
 oh... well i meant then roger moore... but they were still different enough to where people watching these movies when they came out, disliked the change and say that connery was bond and so bond is connery
 right
 and that anyone else trying to play bond can't
 but they didnt say that
 because bond is connnery
 they just thought connery was a better bond
 sure they did
 roger moore has his followers
 just the same as pierce
 i am sure he did but that doesn't get past the point that there are crowds of people who say bond is connery or people today might say bond is brosnan and can't see it as anything else
 yea
 whats the point
 i think we got way past what we were originally talking about
 
 
 
 
 
 so having this new start with less suave and more badassism is still bond
 people might not accept it right now in the same way they didn't for moving past connery
 but my point is to still have it, and to completely change it is no longer bond
 its not completely changing it though
 he is still 007
 and he is still killing people in cool ways...
 that to change it would be better?
 i think it would be... like this next movie for example
 i think i will like this next movie than the other bond movies
 yea, but what i am saying is if they arent going to make an effort to still be bondian then just change his name and make an action movie
 but aren't they still making an effort?
 i hope so
 007?
 secret agent?
 yea, thats not all though
 you can slap that on anything
 i'm not dissing this movie by any means
 i am just saying i hope they do an awesome job
 what i am saying is that the characteristics you ascribe to bond change with the actors playing it as much as it is changing here... here it is changing in that now he is pissed
 i want all the characteristics to be there
 i agree the traits change in the emphasis
 connery badass womanizer
 moore suave
 dalton action hero
 and i agree with you that if he was a bumbling idiot and didn't get any women i will be disappointed
 brosnan pretty boy
 i just want it all to be there
 because if they arent then it wont be bond
 all of it?
 in some way 
 you carazay?
 thats too much for one bond to handle
 you can dress up in a white sheet and not be a ghost pat
 pretty boy, womanizer, suave and action hero
 well everyone of them possessed it
 they just emphasized one trait
 to an extent
 right
 right, agreed
 all i am saying is
 i want this guy to do the same
 thats where the make or break comes into play
 kinda like i can play sports but it is not a very good or well developed trait
 yea
 you still possess it
 brosnan... he was too nice to be a complete womanizer like connery... but he still slept around
 another "pat" would play down the homosexuality and play up the sports side
 face
 yea
 you got it
 just as another kyle might actually be considerate and not just an asshole... yeah you got it
 right
 just making points
 right, exactly
 
 
 
 
 so basically we want craig to be everything
 you do
 but its alright if he plays up the action hero
 ok fine
 oh right yeah
 but if he doesnt possess it all, then he's not bond
 emphasize the strengths
 yes
 ok
 or we should post this convo on our blog
 debates on bond
 debates on debond
 ok
 debunking bond
 yea there we go
 he doesn't exist!
 yeah he does
 it really wouldn't be debunking at all
 whatever
 analysis of a secret agent
 dissassembling bond
 :
 ah there we go
 Analysis of a Secret Agent: Disassembling Bond
 try the other way around
 disassembling bond is a better title
 Disassembling Bond: Analysis of a Secret Agent 
 analysis is more of a description
 yeah good point
 mine is the better title
 face
 but mine lets you know its serious
 yeah yeah
 not some fluesy writing to her mother
 i wish i knew how to spell fluesey
 just jealous talk i hear there
 but i hear yours a compensating
 as compensatin
 as compensating
 ggggggggggggggggg
 there ya happy
 i don't know why but this made me just think of these dream i had where i broke into this underground club after shattering all these windows by jumping through them and i slept with 4 prostitutes
 it was weird
 hmm
 then i didn't pay and i ran out
 on that note i am going to get out of here and take a shower
 alright i'll post this
So, decide for yourself.  Which side do you choose?
 
 
 
 
1 comment:
yeah... i'm a loser.
this was written a few months ago, it's crazy long, and it's a debate on the bondiness of the new bond...
and yet, i read every line.
Post a Comment